Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2008

Requiescat In Pace: Sgt. Jason Boyes

Thank you for your service, Jason Boyes.

CTV:

Sgt. Jason Boyes of 2nd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, based in Shilo, Man., was killed after he stepped on an explosive device.

The 32-year-old was born in Napanee, Ont. (earlier reports had him from Lynn Lake, Man.). He is the first Canadian to be killed while on foot patrol in nearly a year.

"We are devastated by this news. Jason loved his job, he loved the military, and his fellow soldiers loved him back. His world was his daughter, Mackenzie, his wife, Alison, his dogs and his family," Boyes' family said in a statement distributed by the military.

"This was his third tour in Afghanistan. We have always, and still do, support this mission."


My thoughts and best wishes go out to Sgt. Boyes's family, especially his daughter Mackenzie and wife Alison. Sgt. Boyes is a Canadian hero and his sacrifice will not soon be forgotten.

I'll let Guy Laroche have the last word:

"He answered the call of duty one last time in Afghanistan. We will honour his memory, his dedication, and his desire to make a difference in a country that has lost hope that one day its children will grow up to know the real sense of the words 'peace' and 'freedom.'"

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Requiescat In Pace: Trooper Michael Yuki Hayakaze

Statement from the Prime Minister's office:

"I would like to offer my most sincere condolences to the family and friends of Trooper Michael Yuki Hayakaze, who died today in Kandahar Province in the line of duty. His sacrifice will long be remembered.

"The people of Canada will remember that Trooper Hayakaze’s sacrifice was not in vain; that he laid

down his life for the safety of citizens in both Canada and Afghanistan.

The brave men and women of the Canadian Forces who represent us in Afghanistan are a source of pride for all Canadians. Their commitment and dedication to this mission continues to inspire the nation.

The Government of Canada recognizes the difficult work being done by the Canadian Forces in Afghanistan to make the world a safer place and to protect and promote Canadian interests and values on the global stage. The country is indebted to these brave men and women for their continued efforts and sacrifice.”

Trooper Michael Yuki Hayakaze was a member of Lord Strathcona’s Horse (Royal Canadians), based out of Edmonton, Alberta.


I was recently reminded of a superbowl commercial of old. I think I'll take this opportunity to post it.



Requiescat In Pace, Michael Hayakaze. Thank you for your service.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Prince Harry For The Crown: If We're Going To Have A Monarch, He Might As Well Be Awesome

Prince Harry has been serving on the front line in Afghanistan for a couple of months now. It's too bad the story leaked because you'd have to think the damage has been done and for the time being it won't be safe for him to serve, particularly on the front line.

CTV has the story:

Prince Harry has been secretly serving on the front line in Afghanistan since December, Britain's Ministry of Defence said Thursday.

Officials said the prince, who is third in line from the throne, is still in the country.

"He has been fully involved in operations and has run the same risks as everyone else in his Battlegroup," Chief of the General Staff Sir Richard Dannatt, who is head of the British Army, said in a statement Thursday.

Britain's media officer in Helmand said Thursday that Harry has been in Helmand fighting for the past ten weeks.

He said a decision was yet to be made on whether he would be pulled out of the region due to security concerns following the leak.

...

Prince Harry, who is trained as a tank commander, is a Second Lieutenant in the Blues and Royals regiment of the Household Cavalry of the British Army.

"What the last two months have shown is that it is perfectly possible for Prince Harry to be employed just the same as other Army officers of his rank and experience," said Dannatt.

"His conduct on operations in Afghanistan has been exemplary."


I'm no great fan of the monarchy as an institution but I figure if Canada has to have a King, let's make it a good one. Apparently he's third in line for the throne so I figure if we ask the two ahead of him really nicely we'll have ourselves a fighting king in no time.

UPDATE: Great post on the subject over at Taylor & Company. Check it out.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Friday, February 22, 2008

Canada & US Agree To Troop Sharing Program For "Civil Emergencies"

I'm not entirely sure what to make of this. Apparently, Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, head of Canada Command, signed an agreement with a top US military official in Texas on February 14th on the QT which involves shared military activities in cases of "civil emergencies."

According to the Post, the exact nature of the agreement is as follows:

Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other's borders during an emergency.

...

Canada Command spokesman Commander David Scanlon said it will be up to civilian authorities in both countries on whether military assistance is requested or even used.

He said the agreement is "benign" and simply sets the stage for military-to-military co-operation if the governments approve.

"But there's no agreement to allow troops to come in," he said. "It facilitates planning and co-ordination between the two militaries. The ‘allow' piece is entirely up to the two governments."

If U.S. forces were to come into Canada they would be under tactical control of the Canadian Forces but still under the command of the U.S. military, Scanlon added.


The right-wing US blogosphere must be up in arms about this, assuming the story is getting any play down there. I, for one, can't help but feel a little concerned. Next time some would-be Trudeau implements the War Measures Act (or the Emergencies Act as it's called today) it won't necessarily be Canadian troops answering the call. On the bright side, if Toronto ever gets another really heavy snow storm, maybe they can help our boys shovel.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Don't Despair, Tories: The New Conservative Strategy In Afghanistan Is All Part Of The Plan

There have been some major developments in the debate surrounding Canada's role in Afghanistan over the past few days, developments that haven't been all that welcome to a significant number of Conservative bloggers and partisans. The argument has been made - and a strong argument it is - that setting an exit date for a military mission is irresponsible since the goal of the Canadian presence in Kandahar is the achievement of specific tasks; namely, the suppression of the Taliban insurgency and the realization of stability and physical security in the troubled province. Some critics have implied or stated that Harper "blinked first" and that the new plan is a disappointment to Tories who were under the impression that the PM was willing to throw down over the mission.

It's really easy to forget the limitations under which Harper is currently operating. His strong stance on Afghanistan represents a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy and these major political changes are extraordinarily difficult to accomplish with a minority government, no less one as mathematically fragile as Harper's. It's easy to be lulled into a false sense of security considering our current political situation. A divided Liberal opposition headed by an unpopular and bumbling "ivory tower" type has allowed the Tories much more leeway than most minority governments of the past. So it's important to remember that the great triumph of the Harper-led Conservative Party has yet to be achieved; a Conservative majority government. This goal seemed all but impossible in 2004 and exceedingly unlikely in 2006. The new Afghanistan plan is a step towards the attainment of a majority government and, despite our legitimate and principled objections, Harper's decision to compromise must be understood as such.

As Dion drags the Liberals kicking and screaming to the left of the political spectrum (leaving a few centrist and right leaning Liberals feeling disgruntled and betrayed by the once-was-but-no-longer-is "Natural Ruling Party of Canada"), Harper has been given the chance to snag the centrist vote on a lot of crucial issues and, as a result, his popularity has slowly but surely climbed until it has begun to teeter on the cusp of a majority. Although setting an exit date seems like rolling over on Conservative values, managing to extend the mission until 2011 is a political achievement. Harper managed to scare the Liberals into an extension without having to worry too much about triggering an election. It's a testament to his political dexterity that he so skillfully diffused a possible election trigger while coming off as principled but still flexible. Strong on the mission but still cognizant of the political realities of our country.

Harper understands that there are only two real exit strategies for a military operation: victory and defeat. Of course, benchmarks should be set based on the achievement of specific tasks, not on arbitrary and politically-motivated compromises. Presently, however, Canadian voters haven't decided whether they're completely serious about the mission yet. I have no doubt that Harper is dedicated to bringing stability and democracy to Afghanistan and I know that millions of Canadians support him but only a majority in the next federal election will free him to commit to the mission completely.

Harper is still in the process of wooing Canadians. The Conservative election victory in 2006 was partly due to an ideological shift in the Canadian electorate, partly due to a well-run campaign, and partly due to a broken and unpopular Liberal party. He has made good use of his two years in office by playing tough with the divided Liberals while slowly consolidating his reputation and convincing Canadians that he deserves to be Prime Minister. We need to let him take his political victories where he can. Changing the political face of a country is a slow process and the concessions our Prime Minister is making are politically necessary.

So let's call the new Afghanistan plan what it really is. This was not a victory for Dion's Liberals; it was Harper's first major move on the campaign trail. He's shooting for a majority government and I'm not alone in thinking that there's a pretty damn good chance he'll pull it off.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Michael Ignatieff: Canada Needs To Develop Its Military Capabilities & Assert Itself Internationally


That's what we've been saying all along!

Thank God Ignatieff didn't win the Liberal leadership because he's a much stronger leader than Dion is.

The Star Phoenix has the story:

Even as his party calls for Canada to pull back from combat missions in Afghanistan in 2009, prominent Liberal MP Michael Ignatieff said Friday that Canada must be increasingly assertive in the international arena -- and back it up with a strong military -- if it hopes to solve big problems in Afghanistan and other troubled nations.
"We must not wait for the United States to build the kind of multilateral world we want. We musn't hesitate to use our leverage," he said to an over-full lecture hall at the University of Alberta's law centre. "We can't be a country that gives people little lectures. We have to take a stand and back it up with the proper investments."

Ignatieff, a former Harvard professor who now serves as the Liberal opposition's deputy leader, gave a 30-minute speech that tackled issues ranging from economic policy and border security to Darfur and education spending.

His overriding message was that Canada matters more than ever on the world stage, a position that requires us to adopt the unaccustomed approach of "banging on the table."

But it can't be just talk, he added, noting Canada has made a commitment through the United Nations to protect people targeted in genocidal massacres and other areas of violence.

"And you can't protect people just with blue berets and a sidearm" Ignatieff said, picking as an example how peacekeeping forces failed to stop the Rwandan genocide. "It requires -- and this is the difficult bit for Canada -- it requires military capability."

Ignatieff's appearance was arranged through the University of Alberta's Institute for U.S. Policy Studies, a group headed up by former Liberal deputy prime minister Anne McLellan. Although Ignatieff is currently serving in Parliament, he called his speech "an academic lecture" rather than a partisan political event.

There had been some curiosity about whether local members of the federal Conservative Party would show up to question Ignatieff about his "flip-flops" on Canada's mission in Afghanistan. An Alberta Tory had sent an e-mail to riding presidents asking that Conservatives attend the lunchtime session to provide "a skeptical, questioning audience for this hypocrite."
No such inflammatory exchange developed during the event, even though Ignatieff touched on Afghanistan at several points in the speech and the subsequent question-and-answer session.

He did not take a strong position on whether the mission should continue long-term, saying Canadians were troubled by the military involvement and calling for a parliamentary debate. He also praised the recently completed Manley report, agreeing with its message that Canada needs to get more support from its NATO allies.


UPDATE: Patrick Ross has the transcript from the Ignatieff speech here.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Gather 'Round, Children...

It's time for a lesson in conflict management. What do we do when an insurgent sniper takes three shots at our company? Let 'em eat a 500 pound air burst, of course.



H/t AOSHQ

Stumble Upon Toolbar